4.6 Article

Simple and sensitive determination of hydrazine in drinking water by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry after derivatization with naphthalene-2,3-dialdehyde

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Volume 1395, Issue -, Pages 73-78

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.03.051

Keywords

Hydrazine; Naphthalene-2,3-dialdehyde; Liquid chromatography-tandem mass; spectrometry; Derivatization; Drinking water

Funding

  1. South Korean Ministry of Environment (MOE) as part of the Environmental Health Action Program
  2. Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) [ARQ201406005002] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) method was developed to determine the level of hydrazine in drinking water. The method is based on the derivatization of hydrazine with naphthalene-2,3-dicarboxaldehyde (NDA) in water. The optimum conditions for UPLC-MS/MS detection were determined as follows: derivatization reagent dosage, 50 mg/L of NDA; pH 2; and reaction time, 1 min; room temperature. The formed derivative was injected into an LC system without extraction or purification procedures. Under the established conditions, the method was used to detect hydrazine in raw drinking water and chlorinated drinking water. The limits of detection and quantification for hydrazine in drinking water were 0.003 mu g/L and 0.01 mu g/L, respectively. The accuracy was in the range of 97-104%, and precision, expressed as relative standard deviation, was less than 9% in drinking water. Hydrazine was detected at a concentration of 0.13 mu g/L in one sample among 24 raw drinking water samples and in a range of 0.04-0.451 mu g/L in three samples among 24 chlorinated drinking water samples. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available