4.7 Article

Mediated bioelectrochemical system for biosensing the cell viability of Staphylococcus aureus

Journal

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 408, Issue 2, Pages 579-587

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-015-9134-z

Keywords

Microbial electrochemistry; Pathogenic detection; Probing living Staphylococcus aureus; CNTs-based screen printed electrodes

Funding

  1. Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. Taschentuchlabor IZIB - BMBF [03IS2201B]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most dangerous human pathogens and is the cause of numerous illnesses ranging from moderate skin infections to life-threatening diseases. Despite advances made in identifying microorganisms, rapid detection methods for the viability of bacteria are still missing. Here, we report a rapid electrochemical assay for cell viability combining the use of double redox mediators and multiwall carbon nanotubes-screen printed electrodes (MWCNTs-SPE), ferricyanide (FCN) and 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCIP), which served as electron shuttle to enable the bacterial-electrode communications. The current originating from the metabolically active cells was recorded for probing the activity of the intracellular redox centers. Blocking of the respiratory chain pathways with electron transfer inhibitors demonstrated the involvement of the electron transport chain in the reaction. A good correlation between the number of the metabolically active cells and the current was obtained. The proposed assay has been exploited for monitoring cell proliferation of S. aureus during the growth. The sensitivity of the detection method reached 0.1 OD600. Therefore, the technique described is promising for estimating the cell number, measuring the cell viability, and probing intracellular redox center(s).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available