4.2 Article

Simultaneous Determination of Eight Chemicals in Fufang Xueshuantong Capsules by LC-MS-MS with Periodic Polarity Switching

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC SCIENCE
Volume 53, Issue 10, Pages 1757-1764

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/bmv090

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Supporting Plan of Hebei Province of China [12272604]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province-CSPC Pharmaceutical Joint Research Fund of China [H2012206125]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A rapid, sensitive, selective and periodic polarity-switching liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry(LC-MS-MS) method was developed for the simultaneous determination of eight components in an important traditional Chinese medicinal capsule, Fufang Xueshuantong. LC analysis was carried out on a Kinetex 2.6 mu m XB-C18 column by gradient elution. The detection was performed by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) with a periodic polarity-switching electrospray ionization (ESI) source across five periods of switching between positive and negative mode. Periodic polarity-switching was used to acquire maximal responses and to simultaneously detect eight constituents in one analysis run lasting 8 min. All of the analytes showed good linearity (r > 0.9947) in the tested ranges. The average recoveries were in the range of 95.4-103.9% with relative standard deviations <= 6.3%, and the intra-and inter-day variations were <= 3.7%. The developed method was successfully employed to analyze three batches of Fufang Xueshuantong capsule samples. The results showed that the levels of notoginsenoside R1, ginsenoside Rb1 and salvianolic acid B were clearly different in different batches of Fufang Xueshuantong capsules. Furthermore, the new established periodic polarity-switching LC-MS-MS method was proven to be highly sensitive and effective in evaluating the quality of Fufang Xueshuantong capsules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available