4.8 Article

A channel-resolved approach coupled with magnet-captured technique for multianalyte chemiluminescent immunoassay

Journal

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages 1422-1428

Publisher

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2007.11.017

Keywords

immunosensing system; immunoassay; channel resolution; chemiluminescence; multianalyte immunoassay; tumor markers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A concept of channel-resolved multianalyte immunoassay (MAIA) and a semi-automated flow-through chemiluminescent (CL) MAIA system coupled with magnet-captured technique were proposed for rapid quantitation of different analytes in a single run. Using et-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carcinoma antigen 125 (CA 125) as model analytes. They were firstly incubated in the mixtures of capture antibodies-immobilized paramagnetic microspheres (PMs) and corresponding alkaline phosphatase-labeled antibodies under stir and pumped into three parallel detection channels, the PMs were simultaneously captured by magnet, and the CL signals from the three channels were then sequentially collected with the aid of optical shutters to perform quantitative detection. AFP, CEA and CA 125 could be rapidly assayed in the ranges of 1.0-40 mu g/l, 0.20-30 mu g/l and 1.0-50 kU/l with the detection limits of 0.60 mu g/l, 0.080 mu g/l and 0.70 kU/l at 3 sigma, respectively. After manual dispensing of specimen and reagents the whole assay process could be completed in 18 min. The assay results of clinical serum samples with the proposed method were in acceptable agreement with the reference values. This system, based on the designed channel-resolved strategy and magnet-captured technique provides a semi-automated, reusable, simple, sensitive, rapid and low-cost approach for MAIA without using of expensive array detector. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available