4.7 Article

By the Numbers: How is Recovery Defined by the US Endangered Species Act?

Journal

BIOSCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 7, Pages 646-657

Publisher

AMER INST BIOLOGICAL SCI
DOI: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.7

Keywords

extinction risk; Endangered Species Act; recovery; conservation reliant

Categories

Funding

  1. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program of the US Department of Defense
  2. Center for Research on Invasive Species and Small Populations at the University of Idaho
  3. Burton Ellis Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly 40 years after passage of the US Endangered Species Act, the prospects for listed species remain dim because they are too severely imperiled by the time they receive the act's protection. Even if threats are abated, the low abundances required for recovery often preclude a high probability of persistence. The lack of sufficient data for setting recovery Objectives also remains a Carrier. Delisting is considered possible for only 74% of the 1173 species with recovery plans-92% of threatened and 69% of endangered species. The median number of populations required for delisting (8) was at or below the historical numbers for 64% and at or below the numbers at listing for 37% of the species. The median number of individuals required for recovery (2400) exceeded the abundances at listing for 93% of the species, but most were below the levels considered necessary for long-term persistence, especially in changing environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available