4.8 Article

Impact of Miscanthus x giganteus senescence times on fast pyrolysis bio-oil quality

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 335-342

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.069

Keywords

Miscanthus x giganteus; Senescence; Nitrogen remobilisation; Fast pyrolysis; Bio-oil stability

Funding

  1. SUPERGEN Bioenergy II Consortium under Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK (EPSRC) [EP/E039995/1]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council - EPSRC [GR/S28204]
  3. EPSRC DTA award
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme grant [BBSEG00003134]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/W/10963A01B, BBS/E/W/00003134A] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/W/10963A01B, BBS/E/W/00003134A] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study the impact of senescence and harvest time in Miscanthus on the quality of fast pyrolysis liquid (bio-oil) was investigated. Bio-oil was produced using a 1 kg h(-1) fast pyrolysis reactor to obtain a quantity of bio-oil comparable with existing industrial reactors. Bio-oil stability was measured using viscosity, water content, pH and heating value changes under specific conditions. Plant developmental characteristics were significantly different (P <= 0.05) between all harvest points. The stage of crop senescence was correlated with nutrient remobilisation (N, P, K; r(2) = 0.9043, r(2) = 0.9920, r(2) = 0.9977 respectively) and affected bio-oil quality. Harvest time and senescence impacted bio-oil quality and stability. For fast pyrolysis processing of Miscanthus, the harvest time of Miscanthus can be extended to cover a wider harvest window whilst still maintaining bio-oil quality but this may impact mineral depletion in, and long term sustainability of, the crop unless these minerals can be recycled. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available