4.8 Article

Effect of sludge-fly ash ceramic particles (SFCP) on synthetic wastewater treatment in an A/O combined biological aerated filter

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 3, Pages 1149-1155

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.035

Keywords

Biological aerated filter; Sludge-fly ash ceramic particles; Hydraulic retention time; Air-liquid ratio; Recirculation

Funding

  1. National Technological Support Plan [2006BAJ08B05-2]
  2. Shandong High-tech Project [2007GG20006003]
  3. Technological Progress Plan of Jinan, Shandong Province of China [2006061073]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel media-sludge-fly ash ceramic particles (SFCP) employed in an upflow lab-scale A/O BAF were investigated for synthetic wastewater treatment. The influences of hydraulic retention time (HRT), air-liquid ratio (A/L) and recirculation on the removals of chemical oxygen demand (CODcr), ammonia (NH4+-N) and total nitrogen (TN) were discussed. The optimum operation conditions were obtained as HRT of 2.0 h, A/L of 15:1 and 200% recirculation. Under the optimal conditions, 90% CODcr, more than 98% NH3-N and approximately 70% TN were removed. The average consumed volumetric loading rates for CODcr, NH4+-N and TN with 200% recirculation were 4.06, 0.36 and 0.29 kg (m(3) d)(-1), respectively. The CODcr and TN removal mainly occurred in the anoxic zone, while nitrification was completed at the height of 70 cm from the inlet of the bottom due to a suitable column layout of biological aerated filter (BAF). The characteristics of wastewater and backwashing affected TN removal to a large degree. In addition, the features of media (SFCP) and synthetic wastewater contributed to a strong buffer capacity in the BAF system so that the effluent pH at different media height fluctuated slightly and was insensitive to recirculation. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available