4.5 Article

At-line near-infrared spectroscopy for monitoring concentrations in temperature-triggered glutamate fermentation

Journal

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 36, Issue 12, Pages 1879-1887

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-013-0962-y

Keywords

Near-infrared spectroscopy; Glutamate; Glucose; Lactate; Alanine; Multivariate calibration model

Funding

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT 1166]
  2. Tianjin Municipal Education Commission [20120630]
  3. Tianjin Research Program of Science and Technology [12ZCZDSY01900]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program [2013AA102106]
  5. National Science and Technology Supporting Program [2011BAC11BB03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid development in the glutamate fermentation industry has dictated the need for effective fermentation monitoring by rapid and precise methods that provide real-time information for quality control of the end-product. In recent years, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and multivariate calibration have been developed as fast, inexpensive, non-destructive and environmentally safe techniques for industrial applications. The purpose of this study was to develop models for monitoring glutamate, glucose, lactate and alanine concentrations in the temperature-triggered process of glutamate fermentation. NIR measurements of eight batches of samples were analyzed by partial least-squares regression with several spectral pre-processing methods. The coefficient of determination (R (2)), model root-mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), root-mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) and residual predictive deviation (RPD) of the test calibration for the glutamate concentration were 0.997, 3.11 g/L, 2.56 g/L and 19.81, respectively. For the glucose concentration, R (2), RMSEC, RMSEP and RPD were 0.989, 1.37 g/L, 1.29 g/L and 9.72, respectively. For the lactate concentration, R (2), RMSEC, RMSEP and RPD were 0.975, 0.078 g/L, 0.062 g/L and 6.29, respectively. For the alanine concentration, R (2), RMSEC, RMSEP and RPD were 0.964, 0.213 g/L, 0.243 g/L and 5.29, respectively. New batch fermentation as an external validation was used to check the models, and the results suggested that the predictive capacity of the models for the glutamate fermentation process was good.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available