4.5 Article

Force-Field Dependence of Chignolin Folding and Misfolding: Comparison with Experiment and Redesign

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages 1897-1906

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.03.024

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Palacky University [PrF-2011-020]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [203/09/H046]
  3. HPC-Europa2 Transnational Access Program
  4. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0058, CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0017]
  5. Royal Society
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G049998/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. EPSRC [EP/G049998/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the folding of the designed hairpin chignolin, using simulations with four different force fields. Interestingly, we find a misfolded, out-of-register, structure comprising 20-50% of the ordered structures with three force fields, but not with a fourth. A defining feature of the misfold is that Gly-7 adopts a beta(PR) conformation rather than alpha(L). By reweighting, we show that differences between the force fields can mostly be attributed to differences in glycine properties. Benchmarking against NMR data suggests that the preference for beta(PR) is not a force-field artifact. For chignolin, we show that including the misfold in the ensemble results in back-recalculated NMR observables in slightly better agreement with experiment than parameters calculated from a folded ensemble only. For comparison, we show by NMR and circular dichroism spectroscopy that the G7K mutant of chignolin, in which formation of this misfold is impossible, is well folded with stability similar to the wild-type and does not populate the misfolded state in simulation. Our results highlight the complexity of interpreting NMR data for small, weakly structured, peptides in solution, as well as the importance of accurate glycine parameters in force fields, for a correct description of turn structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available