4.5 Article

Structural and Mechanical Analysis of Tectorial Membrane Tecta Mutants

Journal

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 2530-2538

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.04.024

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [26/05]
  2. Federal German Ministry of Education and Research
  3. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health [K08 DC006671, P30 DC010363]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The tectorial membrane (TM) is an extracellular matrix of the cochlea whose prominent role in hearing has been demonstrated through mutation studies. The C1509G mutation of the Tecta gene, which encodes for the a-tectorin protein, leads to hearing loss. The heterozygote TM only attaches to the first row of outer hair cells (OHCs), and the homozygote TM does not attach to any OHCs. Here we measured the morphology and mechanical properties of wild-type, heterozygous, and homozygous Tecta TMs. Morphological analyses conducted with second- and third-harmonic imaging, scanning electron microscopy, and immunolabeling revealed marked changes in the collagen architecture and stereocilin-labeling patterns of the mutant TMs. The mechanical properties of the mutant TM were measured by force spectroscopy. Whereas the axial Young's modulus of the low-frequency (apical) region of Tecta mutant TM samples was similar to that of wild-type TMs, it significantly decreased in the basal region to a value approaching that found at the apex. Modeling simulations suggest that a reduced TM Young's modulus is likely to reduce OHC stereociliary deflection. These findings argue that the heterozygote C1509G mutation results in a lack of attachment of the TM to the OHCs, which in turn reduces both the overall number of OHCs that are involved in mechanotransduction and the degree of mechanotransduction exhibited by the OHCs that remain attached to the TM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available