4.5 Article

Structural evolution of protein-biofilms: Simulations and experiments

Journal

BIOMICROFLUIDICS
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3488672

Keywords

adsorption; atomic force microscopy; biochemistry; biomedical materials; ellipsometry; enzymes; films; molecular biophysics; molecular configurations; Monte Carlo methods; proteins; reaction kinetics; van der Waals forces

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation [GRK 1276, GRK 532]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The control of biofilm formation is a challenging goal that has not been reached yet in many aspects. One unsolved question is the role of van der Waals forces and another is the importance of mutual interactions between the adsorbing and the adsorbed biomolecules (critical crowding). In this study, a combined experimental and theoretical approach is presented, which fundamentally probes both aspects. On three model proteins-lysozyme, alpha-amylase, and bovine serum albumin-the adsorption kinetics is studied experimentally. Composite substrates are used enabling a separation of the short- and the long-range forces. Although usually neglected, experimental evidence is given for the influence of van der Waals forces on the protein adsorption as revealed by in situ ellipsometry. The three proteins were chosen for their different conformational stabilities in order to investigate the influence of conformational changes on the adsorption kinetics. Monte Carlo simulations are used to develop a model for these experimental results by assuming an internal degree of freedom to represent conformational changes. The simulations also provide data on the distribution of adsorption sites. By in situ atomic force microscopy we can also test this distribution experimentally, which opens the possibility to, e.g., investigate the interactions between adsorbed proteins. (C) 2010 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3488672]

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available