Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting

Comparative Effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Treatments: Evaluating Statistical Adjustments for Confounding in Observational Data

(2010) J. Hadley et al.   JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Instrumental variable methods in comparative safety and effectiveness research

(2010) M. Alan Brookhart et al.   PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY

Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification

(2010) Susanne Stampf et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE

Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships

(2009) Jeremy A. Rassen et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies

(2009) Jaclyn L.F. Bosco et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Evidence from Nonrandomized Studies: A Case Study on the Estimation of Causal Effects

(2008) C. Schmoor et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Systematic differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score methods and logistic regression

(2008) Edwin P Martens et al.   INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Comments on ‘The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios’ by Peter C. Austin,Statistics in Medicine2007;26(16):3078–3094

(2008) Erika Graf et al.   STATISTICS IN MEDICINE