4.3 Article

Copper deficiency has minimal impact on ferroportin expression or function

Journal

BIOMETALS
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 633-642

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10534-012-9521-2

Keywords

Copper deficiency; Rodents; Iron; Ferroportin; Anemia

Funding

  1. US Public Health Service NIH [HD-39708]
  2. International Copper Association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interactions between copper and iron homeostasis have been known since the nineteenth century when anemia in humans was first described due to copper limitation. However, the mechanism remains unknown. Intestinal and liver iron concentrations are usually higher following copper deficiency (CuD). This may be due to impaired function of the multicopper oxidases hephaestin or ceruloplasmin (Cp), respectively. However, iron retention could be due to altered ferroportin (Fpn), the essential iron efflux transporter in enterocytes and macrophages. Fpn mRNA is controlled partially by intracellular iron and IRE dependence. CuD should augment Fpn based on iron level. Some argue that Fpn stability is controlled partially by membrane ferroxidase (GPI-Cp). CuD should result in lower Fpn since GPI-Cp expression and function is reduced. Fpn turnover is controlled by hepcidin. CuD results in variable Hamp (hepcidin) expression. Fpn mRNA and protein level were evaluated following dietary CuD in rats and mice. To correlate with Fpn expression, measurements of tissue iron were conducted in several rodent models. Following CuD there was little change in Fpn mRNA. Previous work indicated that under certain circumstances Fpn protein was augmented in liver and spleen following CuD. Fpn levels in CuD did not correlate with either total iron or non-heme iron (NHI), as iron levels in CuD liver were higher and in spleen lower than copper adequate controls. Fpn steady state levels appear to be regulated by a complex set of factors. Changes in Fpn do not explain the anemia of CuD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available