4.5 Article

Comparison of Body Mass Index with Body Fat Percentage in the Evaluation of Obesity in Chinese

Journal

BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 173-179

Publisher

CHINESE CENTER DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-3988(10)60049-9

Keywords

BMI; BF%; Obesity

Funding

  1. Major Program of Shanghai Municipality for Basic Research [08dj1400601]
  2. Shanghai Pujiang Program [OTpj14062]
  3. Shanghai key Laboratlry of Diabetes Mellitus [08DZ2230200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate the present Chinese body mass index (BMI) criteria with body fat percentage (BF%) in determining obesity in Chinese population. Methods A total of 4 907 subjects (age: 20-90 yrs) were enrolled in the baseline survey of a longitudinal epidemiological study, and 2 638 of them were reevaluated in 5.5 years later. The Chinese BMI and WHO BF% were used to define obesity, respectively. Results The diagnostic agreement between the Chinese BM I and WHO BF% definitions for obesity was poor for both men (kappa: 0.210, 95% Cl: 0.179-0.241) and women (kappa: 0.327, 95% Cl: 0.296-0.358). However, BMI had a good correlation with BF% both in men (r: 0.785, P<0.01) and women (r: 0.864, P<0.01). The age and sex-adjusted relative risks (RR) for incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) were significantly higher in subjects with intermediate BF% (BF%:20.1%-25% for men, 30.1%-35% for women) (RR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.23-4.48) and high BF%(BF%>25% for men and >35% for women)(RR: 2.89, 95% Cl: 1.43-5.81), or in subjects with high BMI (BMI >= 28 kg/m(2)) (RR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.31-4.63) when compared to those with low BF% (BF%<= 20% for men and <= 30% for women) or low BMI (BMI <24 kg/m(2)) respectively. No difference in risk could be found in those with intermediate BMI (BMI: 24-27.9 kg/m(2)) (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.86-2.40), as compared to those with low BMI (BMI<24 kg/m(2)), whose BF% ranged widely from 7.8 to 50.3%. Conclusion BMI was correlated with BF%. Both BMI and BF% were associated with high risk for T2DM. However, BMI had its limitations in the interpretation of subjects with BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m(2).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available