4.5 Article

The orthotropic viscoelastic behavior of aortic elastin

Journal

BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 613-625

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-010-0260-4

Keywords

Elastin; Viscoelasticity; Orthotropic hyperelasticity; Constitutive model; Biaxial tensile test; Stress relaxation

Funding

  1. NSF [0700507, 0954825]
  2. College of Engineering at Boston University
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0954825] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  6. Directorate For Engineering [0700507] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we studied the viscoelastic behaviors of isolated aortic elastin using combined modeling and experimental approaches. Biaxial stress relaxation and creep experiments were performed to study the time-dependent behavior of elastin. Experimental results reveal that stress relaxation preconditioning is necessary in order to obtain repeatable stress relaxation responses. Elastin exhibits less stress relaxation than intact or decellularized aorta. The rate of stress relaxation of intact and decellularized aorta is linearly dependent on the initial stress levels. The rate of stress relaxation for elastin increases linearly at stress levels below about 60 kPa; however, the rate changes very slightly at higher initial stress levels. Experimental results also show that creep response is negligible for elastin, and the intact or decellularized aorta. A quasi-linear viscoelasticity model was incorporated into a statistical mechanics based eight-chain microstructural model at the fiber level to simulate the orthotropic viscoelastic behavior of elastin. A user material subroutine was developed for finite element analysis. Results demonstrate that this model is suitable to capture both the orthotropic hyperelasticity and viscoelasticity of elastin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available