4.8 Article

Mucosal vaccination using claudin-4-targeting

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 31, Issue 20, Pages 5463-5471

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.047

Keywords

Immunomodulation; Mucosa; Drug delivery; Epithelium

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [21689006]
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  5. Kansai Biomedical Cluster project in Saito
  6. Japan Science and Technology Agency
  7. Japan Health Sciences Foundation
  8. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21689006] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) plays pivotal roles in mucosal immune responses. Efficient delivery of antigens to MALT is a critical issue for the development of mucosal vaccines. Although claudin-4 is preferentially expressed in MALT in the gut, a claudin-4-targeting approach for mucosal vaccination has never been developed. In the present study, we found that claudin-4 is expressed in nasal MALT, and we prepared a fusion protein of ovalbumin (OVA) as a model antigen with a claudin-4-binder, the C-terminal fragment of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (C-CPE) (OVA-C-CPE). Nasal immunization with OVA-C-CPE, but not a mixture of OVA and C-CPE, induced the production of OVA-specific serum IgG and nasal, vaginal and fecal IgA. Deletion of the claudin-4-binding region in OVA-C-CPE attenuated the induction of the immune responses. OVA-C-CPE immunization activated both Th1 and Th2 responses, and nasal immunization with OVA-C-CPE showed anti-tumor activity in mice inoculated with OVA-expressing thymoma cells. These results indicate that the claudin-4-targeting may be a potent strategy for nasal vaccination. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available