4.5 Article

Toll-like receptor 3 activation induces antiviral immune responses in mouse Sertoli cells

Journal

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
Volume 79, Issue 4, Pages 766-775

Publisher

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.068619

Keywords

cell surface molecules; chemokines; cytokines; immunology; mouse; Sertoli cells; signal transduction; testis; toll-like receptors; type I interferons

Funding

  1. MIUR PRIN
  2. ASI [I/061/06/0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and elicit antimicrobial immune responses. In the testis, viruses can induce pathological conditions, such as orchitis, and may participate in the etiology of testicular cancer; however, the molecular mechanisms involved remain under investigation. it has been suggested that because they constitutively express interferon (IFN)-inducible antiviral proteins, Sertoli cells participate in the testicular antiviral defense system. Previously, we demonstrated a key function of mouse Sertoli cells in the bactericidal testicular defense mechanism mediated by a panel of TLRs. To better characterize the potential role of Sertoli cells in the response against testicular viral infections, we investigated the TLR3 expression and function in these cells. Sertoli cells express TLR3, and under stimulation with the synthetic double-stranded RNA analogue poly (K), they produce the proinflammatory molecule ICAM1 and secrete functionally active CCL2 chemokine. Using both pharmacological and genetic approaches, we found that these effects are TLR3-dependent. Moreover, using ELISA, we found that IFNA is constitutively produced and not further inducible, whereas IFNB1 is absent and dramatically induced only by transfected poly (I:C), indicating different control mechanisms underlying IFNA and IFNB1 production. To conclude, poly 0:0 elicits both inflammatory and antiviral responses in Sertoli cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available