4.2 Article

Impact of Delirium on Distress, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Cognition 6 Months and 1 Year after Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 824-831

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.01.003

Keywords

Delirum; Stem cell transplantation; Distress; Quality of life; Cognition; Outcomes

Funding

  1. American Cancer Society [RPG-97-035-01-PBR]
  2. University of Washington
  3. National Cancer Institute [CA63030, CA78990, CA112631]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Delirium commonly occurs during myeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Little is known about how delirium during the acute phase of HCT affects long-term distress, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and neurocognitive functioning. This prospective, cohort study examines these outcomes at 6 months and 1 year in 90 patients undergoing HCT. Patients completed a battery assessing distress, HRQOL, and subjective neuropsychological functioning before receiving their first HCT as well as at 6 months and 1 year. Patients with a delirium episode within the 4 weeks after HCT had significantly more distress and fatigue at 6 months (P < .004) and at 1 year (P < .03), compared with patients without delirium. At 1 year, patients with delirium also had worse symptoms of depression and post traumatic stress (P < .03). Patients with delirium had worse physical health on the SF-12 at 6 months (P < .03) and worse mental health on the SF-12 at 1 year (P < .03). At both 6 months and 1 year, patients with delirium after HCT reported worse memory (P < .009) and executive functioning (P < .006). Delirium during the acute phase of HCT is significantly associated with persistent distress, decreased HRQOL, and subjective neurocognitive dysfunction at both 6 months and 1 year. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 824-831(2010) (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available