4.2 Article

New-Onset Lymphopenia Assessed during Routine Follow-up Is a Risk Factor for Relapse Postautologous Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Journal

BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 376-383

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.029

Keywords

Absolute lymphocyte count; Autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Diffuse large B cell lymphoma; Relapse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A specific predictor during routine follow-up to ascertain risk for postautologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (post-APHSCT) relapse in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has not been identified. Thus, we studied if new-onset lymphopenia measured by the absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was a marker of post-APHSCT NHL relapse. ALC was obtained at the time of confirmed relapse, and at last follow-up with no relapse. From 1993 until 2005, 269 patients treated with APHSCT for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were included in this study. Patients at last follow-up without relapse (N = 137) had a higher ALC compared with those with low ALC at the time of confirmed relapsed (N = 132) (median ALC x 10(9)/L of 1.66 versus 0.71, P < .0001, respectively). ALC at follow-up was a strong predictor for relapse with an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86 (P < .0001). An ALC < 1.0 x 10(9)/L at the time of confirmed relapse had a positive predictive value of 89% and a positive likelihood ratio of 8.4 to predict relapse post-APHSCT. Patients with an ALC >= 1.0 x 10(9)/L (N = 147) had a cumulative incidence of relapse of 19% versus 92%, with an ALC < 1.0 x 10(9)/L (N = 122) (P < .0001). This study suggests that new-onset lymphopenia measured by ALC can be used as marker to assess risk of DLBCL relapse during routine follow-up for after APHSCT. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 16: 376-383 (2010) (C) 2010 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available