4.5 Article

Assessment of 12 Metals and Metalloids in Blood of General Populations Living in Wuhan of China by ICP-MS

Journal

BIOLOGICAL TRACE ELEMENT RESEARCH
Volume 189, Issue 2, Pages 344-353

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12011-018-1486-8

Keywords

Metals and metalloids; Biomonitoring; Whole blood; ICP-MS

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31600666]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Assessment of trace element levels in general population from the specific area is of importance for nutritional and occupational monitoring. In the current study, baseline blood levels of 12 toxic and/or essential metals and metalloids, including arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), chromium (Cr), thallium (Tl), manganese (Mn), copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and magnesium (Mg), in general populations (n=477) of Wuhan in central China were investigated by using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). The geometric means for As, Cd, Pb, Hg, Cr, Tl, Mn, and Cu were measured as 2.25, 0.70, 17.84, 1.90, 0.36, <0.05, 12.40, and 783.76g/L, respectively. The geometric means for Zn, Ca, Fe, and Mg were 5.85, 56.66, 488.98, and 39.44mg/L, respectively. We found the men had higher blood As, Pb, Hg, Zn, Fe, and Mg levels but had lower blood Cu and Ca levels than the women (p<0.05). Age-related difference were found for blood Cu, Zn, Ca, Mg, Pb, Mn, As, Cd, and Hg levels (p<0.05). Moreover, many metal concentrations were found correlated, with the strongest correlations between the pairs Fe-Mg (r=0.57), Fe-Zn (r=0.42), As-Hg (r=0.46), Ca-Cu (r=0.34), Pb-Hg (r=0.36), Pb-Cd (r=0.31), Pb-As (r=0.25), and Ca-Fe (r=-0.23). Compared with reports from other countries, most of our results were consistent, except that As Pb, Hg, Mn, and Cu showed different blood levels with European, Korea, or Beijing areas. Our study would be of importance for nutritional, environmental, and/or occupational monitoring of these metals in human.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available