4.0 Article

The frequency of the spontaneous behavioral response in Paramecium tetraurelia is simultaneously modulated by both ultradian and circadian rhythms

Journal

BIOLOGICAL RHYTHM RESEARCH
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 377-390

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09291016.2012.692254

Keywords

Paramecium; circadian; ultradian; behavioral response; lithium

Funding

  1. University Senate of Indiana University of Pennsylvania
  2. FDPC grant from the state of Pennsylvania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The behavioral response of Paramecium tetraurelia is due to changes in the direction of swimming, which is initiated by the generation of an action potential that causes the re-orientation of the ciliary beat. The frequency of spontaneous behavioral responses displays an ultradian rhythm, with a periodicity of approximately 50 min. Furthermore, this rhythm is disrupted by the addition of LiCl, due to the interruption of the inositol signaling pathway. The present work is an observation of the frequency of the behavioral response for a 72-h period. The frequency of the behavioral response is influenced by a circadian clock, in that the frequency of behavioral responses changes during a 24-h period, while the periodicity of the ultradian clock remains unchanged. The addition of LiCl also disrupts the circadian rhythm, lengthening the circadian period from 24 h to 27.4 h. However, unlike the ultradian rhythm, where the addition of myo-inositol inhibits the LiCl effect, myo-inositol has no effect on the disruption of the circadian rhythm. In order to ascertain the effect of LiCl on the circadian clock, cells were grown in the presence of indirubin, a compound known to inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3); this enzyme is also inhibited by LiCl. When cells are incubated with indirubin for several hours, the circadian rhythm is lengthened to approximately 27 h, while the ultradian rhythm is unaffected. Furthermore, a decrease in GSK3 by RNA interference gives similar results. Therefore, the frequency of the behavioral response in Paramecium appears to be controlled by two different biological rhythms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Psychology

The Venus effect in real life and in photographs

Marco Bertamini, Rebecca Lawson, Luke Jones, Madeline Winters

ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2010)

Article Behavioral Sciences

Impact of age, sleep pressure and circadian phase on time-of-day estimates

Jakub Spaeti, Mirjam Muench, Katharina Blatter, Vera Knoblauch, Luke A. Jones, Christian Cajochen

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH (2009)

Article Psychology

The Remembrance of Times Past: Interference in Temporal Reference Memory

Ruth S. Ogden, J. H. Wearden, Luke A. Jones

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE (2008)

Article Psychology, Biological

Good vibrations: Human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality

Luke A. Jones, Ellen Poliakoff, Jill Wells

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Psychology, Biological

More is still not better: Testing the perturbation model of temporal reference memory across different modalities and tasks

Ruth S. Ogden, Luke A. Jones

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2009)

Article Psychology, Biological

Are memories for duration modality specific?

Ruth S. Ogden, John H. Wearden, Luke A. Jones

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2010)

Article Psychology, Biological

Click trains and the rate of information processing: Does ospeeding upo subjective time make other psychological processes run faster?

Luke A. Jones, Clare S. Allely, John H. Wearden

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)

Article Psychology, Biological

Modality effects in memory for basic stimulus attributes: A temporal and nontemporal comparison

Ruth S. Ogden, Luke A. Jones

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2011)

Article Psychology, Biological

Explaining between-group differences in performance on timing tasks

John H. Wearden, Luke A. Jones

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2013)

Meeting Abstract Ophthalmology

The rubber hand illusion: long term effects and interoceptive training

Elizabeth Lewis, Ellen Poliakoff, Luke Jones, Emma Gowen

PERCEPTION (2015)

Proceedings Paper Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Repetitive stimulation and its affect on both temporal and non-temporal judgements

Luke A. Jones

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TIMING AND TIME PERCEPTION (2014)

Article Psychology, Experimental

The interaction between duration, velocity and repetitive auditory stimulation

Alexis D. J. Makin, Ellen Poliakoff, Joe Dillon, Aimee Perrin, Thomas Mullet, Luke A. Jones

ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2012)

Article Psychology, Experimental

The role of executive functions in human prospective interval timing

R. S. Ogden, E. Salominaite, L. A. Jones, J. E. Fisk, C. Montgomery

ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2011)

Article Psychology, Biological

Is the growth of subjective time in humans a linear or nonlinear function of real time?

J. H. Wearden, Luke A. Jones

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2007)

No Data Available