4.6 Article

Effect of Cryptococcus laurentii and calcium chloride on control of Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea infections in pear fruit

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 169-175

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.01.012

Keywords

Cryptococcus laurentii; Calcium chloride (CaCl2); Pear; Penicillium expansum; Botrytis cinerea; Biocontrol; Postharvest

Funding

  1. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [201061]
  2. National Public Benefit (Agricultural) Research Foundation of China [200903044]
  3. Program for Key Innovative Research Team of Zhejiang Province [2009R50036]
  4. Open Foundation from Top Key Discipline of Modern Agricultural Biotechnology and Biological Control of Crop Diseases in Zhejiang Provincial Colleges [2010KFJJ006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the biocontrol yeast Cryptococcus laurentii and calcium chloride (CaCl2) in suppressing the blue and gray mold rots in pear fruit wounds and the possible mechanisms involved. The results from the presented investigation showed that combined treatment of pear fruit wounds with C. laurentii and CaCl2 was a much better approach for inhibition of Penicillium expansum and Botrytis cinerea infections than C. laurentii or CaCl2 alone. CaCl2 neither affected the growth of C. laurentii in vitro or in vivo, nor directly inhibited the mold rots in pear fruit. However, CaCl2 was shown to elicit the fruit resistance to mold rots when the time interval between CaCl2-treatment and pathogen-inoculation was increased up to 24 h, being associated with an activation of the peroxidase activity of pear fruit. Therefore, it could be proposed that the mechanism by which CaCl2 reinforced the biocontrol efficacy of C. laurentii was mainly due to its ability to induce the fruit natural resistance. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available