4.6 Article

Enhancing biological control by an omnivorous lacewing: Floral resources reduce aphid numbers at low aphid densities

Journal

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
Volume 55, Issue 3, Pages 159-165

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.09.001

Keywords

Anacharis zealandica; Acyrthosiphon pisum; Micromus tasmaniae; Fagopyrum esculentum; Alfalfa; Lucerne; Nectar; Plant-provided food; Longevity; Conservation biological control; Predator-prey dynamics

Funding

  1. New Zealand Foundation for Research Science and Technology (FRST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The availability of plant resources to omnivorous arthropod predators may have a positive, negative or negligible effect on their population densities and predation rates, depending on the availability of prey. At high prey densities, flowering buckwheat has been shown to negatively impact populations of the brown lacewing, an omnivorous predator, due to the probable increase in parasitism rate of lacewing larvae by their primary parasitoid, Anacharis zealandica. However, little is known about the effect of buckwheat flowers on this insect community at low prey densities. We used field cages to assess the effects of nectar provision by flowering buckwheat on the population dynamics of the pea aphid, the brown lacewing and its parasitoid A. zealandica in an alfalfa field, under low aphid densities in the New Zealand summer. The insects were sampled every 2 weeks with a suction device, then counted and released on each sampling date from 15 January to 15 March 2007. Buckwheat significantly increased lacewing populations and significantly decreased aphid numbers by 70% and 39%, respectively. The buckwheat had its greatest effect at the end of summer (February/March) for both these species. It had no effect on A. zealandica abundance. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available