Journal
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
Volume 144, Issue 12, Pages 2931-2940Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.08.012
Keywords
Population structure; Genetic diversity; Decline; House sparrow; F-ST; Genetic monitoring
Funding
- Academy of Finland [7183/303/82, 1118484, 1131390]
- Nessling Foundation
- Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
- Norwegian Research Council [191847]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A drastic decline in abundance prompts conservation measures, even though a species may still be common, partly because such a decline may be associated with loss of genetic variability. Longitudinal evidence (i.e. repeated measures across time) for loss of genetic diversity is scarce and mostly concerns organisms that have experienced a severe bottleneck Here, we study the house sparrow in Finland, where a strong (50-86%) reduction in abundance occurred in four decades, starting earlier and resulting steeper decline in the south than in the north. Based on thirteen polymorphic microsatellites, we compared 12 Finnish populations both prior (mid-1980s) and after (2009) the major population decline. There was no evidence of bottlenecks and only little loss of genetic variation, but we found a significant threefold increase in genetic differentiation (F-ST) across the populations. This may reflect a non-equilibrium situation between the rates of change in the genetic diversity and differentiation and indicate future loss of genetic diversity. Our findings indicate that a strong decline in population size in a relatively common species still leaves a noticeable population-genetic imprint and warrants conservation concern. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available