4.3 Article

Coffee Inhibits Adipocyte Differentiation via Inactivation of PPARγ

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 1820-1825

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b14-00378

Keywords

3T3-L1; adipocyte; coffee; differentiation; obesity; peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma)

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. MEXT-Supported Program for the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24500996] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent epidemiological studies showed that coffee consumption is associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes, presumably due to suppression of excess fat accumulation in adipocytes. However, the mechanism underlying the effect of coffee on adipocyte differentiation has not been well documented. To elucidate the mechanism, we investigated the effect of coffee on the differentiation of mouse preadipocyte 3T3-L1 cells. Coffee reduced the accumulation of lipids during adipocytic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. At 5% coffee, the accumulation of lipids decreased to half that of the control. Coffee also inhibited the expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), a transcription factor controlling the differentiation of adipocytes. Furthermore, coffee reduced the expression of other differentiation marker genes, aP2, adiponectin, CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBP alpha), glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4), and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), during adipocyte differentiation. Major bioactive constituents in coffee extracts, such as caffeine, trigonelline, chlorogenic acid, and caffeic acid, showed no effect on PPAR gamma gene expression. The inhibitory activity was produced by the roasting of the coffee beans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available