4.3 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: Preventive Effect of Morinda citrifolia Fruit Juice on Neuronal Damage Induced by Focal Ischemia (Retracted article. See vol. 42, pg. 1957, 2019)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 405-409

Publisher

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.32.405

Keywords

middle cerebral artery occlusion; ischemia; Morinda citrifolia; infarction; self-medication

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [30382328]
  2. Kobe Gakuin University
  3. Cooperative Research Center of Life Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is known that the fruit juice of Morinda citrifolia (M. citrifolia, Noni, Rubiaceae) has various pharmacological effects such as antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activities, which may help the inhibition of ischemic neuronal damage. Here, we examined the effect of the fruit juice of M. citrifolia (Noni juice) on the brain damage caused by ischemic stress in mice. Noni juice was obtained from the mature fruit grown in Okinawa (about 1.5 1/4 kg of fruit; 100% Okinawa Noni juice (ONJ). Male ddY mice were supplied with 3% or 10% juice in the drinking water for 7d, and compared to the control group. On the 7th day, mice were subjected to 2 h of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Interestingly, the intake of juice reduced the infarct volume as analyzed by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining on the 3rd day of MCAO when compared to the control group. Furthermore, we found that the neurological deficit scores (NDS) were decreased after the reperfusion in the juice-supplied mice. On the other hand, the intake of juice did not affect the expression levels of antioxidant such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase. The present study suggests that Noni juice may have a preventive effect against cerebral ischemic stress, while further studies are needed to explain the detailed mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available