4.5 Article

Positive effect of reduced aeration rate on growth and stereospecificity of DL-malic acid consumption by Azospirillum brasilense: Improving the shelf life of a liquid inoculant formulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 74-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.12.020

Keywords

Malic acid; Oxygen mass transfer; Azospirillum brasilense; Rhizosphere; Pneumatic bioreactors

Funding

  1. CONACyT [220795, 178528]
  2. CONACYT-INNOVAPYME [214404]
  3. PAPIIT-UNAM [IN-210013, IN-209113]
  4. CONACYT-Mexico

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Azospirillum brasilense has significance as a growth promoter in plants of commercial interest. Two industrial native strains (Start and Calf), used as a part of an inoculant formulation in Mexico during the last 15 years, were incubated in laboratory-scale pneumatic bioreactors at different aeration rates. In both strains, the positive effect of decreased aeration was observed. At the lowest (0.1 vvm, air volume/liquid volume x minute), the highest biomass were obtained for Calf (7.8 x 10(10) CFU/ml), and Start (2.9 x 10(9) CFU/ml). These were higher in one magnitude order compared to cultures carried out at 0.5 vvm, and two compared to those at 1.0 vvm. At lower aeration, both stereoisomeric forms of malic acid were consumed, but at higher aeration, just l-malate was consumed. A reduction in aeration allows an increase of the shelf life and the microorganism saved higher concentrations of polyhydroxybutyrate. The selected fermentation conditions are closely related to those prevalent in large-scale bioreactors and offer the possibility of achieving high biomass titles with high shelf life at a reduced costs, due to the complete use of a carbon source at low aeration of a low cost raw material as DL-malic acid mixture in comparison with the l-malic acid stereoisomer. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available