4.3 Article

Effects of milling and surfactants on suspensibility and spore viability in Paenibacillus polymyxa powder formulations

Journal

BIOCONTROL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1103-1116

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09583157.2011.603408

Keywords

Paenibacillus polymyxa; wettable powder; milling; surfactant; suspensibility; spore viability

Funding

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Program [2006AA10A211]
  2. National Agriculture Science and Technology Transformation Foundation [2007GB2C000101]
  3. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology Transformation Foundation [0634H1N02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two milling methods and five surfactants were tested for their effects on the suspensibility of a wettable powder formulation of Paenibacillus polymyxa HY96-2 (P. polymyxa original powder or PPOP). Both hammer milling and jet milling significantly improved suspensibility of PPOP (from 8.1 to 26.4% and 58.3%, respectively), and did not decrease spore viability. Five surfactants (EFW (R), D-425 (R), sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate, tea saponin and sodium lignosulphonate) were each mixed with jet milled powder (JMP). The best results were obtained with sodium lignosulphonate and D425. These gave equal improvement in suspensibility. Sodium lignosulphonate had the best biocompatibility; spore viability values of JMP mixed with this at 1, 3, 5, or 10% (w/w) were all over 95.0%. Addition of sodium lignosulphonate to hammer milled powder (HMP) or JMP at 5% (w/w) increased suspensibility from 26.4 to 38.6% and from 58.3 to 81.1%, respectively. Our results suggest that jet milling and sodium lignosulphonate can synergistically improve the suspensibility of P. polymyxa wettable powder without adverse effects on spore viability. These findings will accelerate the commercialization of P. polymyxa wettable powder and provide a basis for the development of other biopesticides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available