4.0 Article

In vitro and In vivo Biocontrol of Soil-Borne Phytopathogenic Fungi by Certain Bioagents and Their Possible Mode of Action

Journal

BIOCONTROL SCIENCE
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 155-167

Publisher

SOC ANTIBACTERIAL & ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS, JAPAN
DOI: 10.4265/bio.17.155

Keywords

Biocontrol; Soil-borne pathogens; Bacillus subtilis; Trichoderma harzianum; Chitinase

Funding

  1. King Abdelaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Saudi Arabia [ARP-28-11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate new wide-spectrum biological control agents against soilborne fungal plant pathogens. Screening of 336 fungal strains and 256 bacterial strains was carried out in vitro to select the most promising isolates for controlling destructive pathogens of greenhouse-vegetables. In dual cultures, Bacillus subtilis JF419701 and Trichoderma harzianum JF419706 (teleomorph: Hypocrea lixii) inhibited the growth of Alternaria alternata, Fusarium oxysporum, Exserohllum rostratum, Macrophomina phaseolina, Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani. Microscopic examination showed the ability of T. harzianum JF419706 to parasitize the hyphae of all pathogens and kill them. T. harzianum produced the cell wall degrading enzymes; alpha-1-3-glucanase (0.83 U/ml), beta-1-3-glucanase (0.89 U/ml) and chitinase (0.86 U/ml) in high concentrations. However, B. subtilis produced proteases in very high concentrations (9341.64 U/ml). The culture filtrate of T. harzianum did not show any antifungal effect. The cell free extract of B. subtilis, containing cyano-compounds, suppressed the growth of all phytopathogens, especially M. phaseolina. Results proved the efficacy of the two biological control agents to control the common soil pathogens either singly or in combination. We recommend further field experiments to study either the synergistic or antagonistic interactions between them under natural conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available