4.5 Article

Reproduction and dispersal of wing-clipped predatory stinkbugs, Podisus nigrispinus in cotton fields

Journal

BIOCONTROL
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages 9-17

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10526-008-9150-4

Keywords

Asopinae; Augmentative release; Mating behavior; Limited-flight predator; Reproductive success

Categories

Funding

  1. PIBIC/CNPq/UFRPE
  2. FACEPE/MCT/CNPq/CT-INFRA [APQ-0157-5.01/06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Release of arthropod predators holds promise for suppressing herbivorous insect populations in commercial crops below economic threshold levels, but dispersal from release sites remains a practical issue that can limit their impact. This study examined mating behavior, survival, reproduction, and dispersion of membranous wing-clipped and wing-intact adults of the predatory stinkbug Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), a generalist predator of cotton pests in South America. After laboratory studies demonstrated that wing-clipping did not alter mating behavior or reproductive output, field studies were conducted in experimental plots. In each experiment, 50 mated females (5-10 days old) were released at a central point. After 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, dispersion was measured via drop-cloth samples at distances up to 16 m from the release point. After 96 h, plants on each survey and release point were collected and, in the laboratory, they were inspected for egg masses. During the first 24 to 48 h after release, predators from both groups disappeared, but recovery of the wing-clipped predators was significantly greater (38.6% for wing-clipped and 17.3% for wing-intact predators) in all three releases. Importantly, oviposition rates on the release site were about three times greater for wing-clipped females (0.07 vs. 0.02 egg masses per plant), indicating that limiting flight induces females to stay and lay their eggs, hence, allowing local establishment of a new generation of predators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available