4.7 Article

The Conformation of the Poly(ethylene glycol) Chain in Mono-PEGylated Lysozyme and Mono-PEGylated Human Growth Hormone

Journal

BIOCONJUGATE CHEMISTRY
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 2317-2323

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bc2003583

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET 0755284, DMR-0454672, DMR-0520547]
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy [CNMS2009-212]
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0755284] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Covalent conjugation of poly(ethylene glycol) or PEGylation has proven an effective strategy to improve pharmaceutical protein efficacy by hindering recognition by proteases, inhibitors, and antibodies and by retarding renal clearance. Because it determines the strength and range of intermolecular steric forces and the hydrodynamic properties of the conjugates, the configuration of protein-conjugated PEG chains is the key factor determining how PEGylation alters protein in vivo circulation time. Mono-PEGylated proteins are typically described as having a protective PEG shroud wrapped around the protein, but recent dynamic light scattering studies suggested that conjugates adopt a dumbbell configuration, with a relatively unperturbed PEG random coil adjacent to the globular protein. We used small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) to distinguish between the dumbbell model and the shroud model for chicken-egg lysozyme and human growth hormone covalently conjugated to a single 20 kDa PEG chain. The SANS contrast variation technique was used to isolate the PEG portion of the conjugate. Scattering intensity profiles were well described by the dumbbell model and inconsistent with the shroud model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available