4.5 Article

DNA methylation dynamics in the hepatic CYP3A4 gene promoter

Journal

BIOCHIMIE
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages 2338-2344

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biochi.2012.07.013

Keywords

Epigenetics; CYP3A4; DNA methylation

Funding

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council
  2. Karolinska Institutet
  3. European Union through the European Social Fund [MJD71]
  4. Estonian Science Foundation [ETF9293]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CYP3A4 gene, encoding the major drug metabolizing enzyme in humans, exhibits a high interindividual variation in hepatic expression that can lead to interindividual differences in drug metabolism and associated adverse drug effects. Much of the interindividual variability in CYP3A4 remains unexplained. In the present study we investigated the role of DNA methylation in influencing the interindividual CYP3A4 expression. Individual CpG methylation within the similar to 12 kb CYP3A4 regulatory region was investigated in 72 adult as well as in 7 fetal human livers using bisulfite sequencing. We identified highly variable CpG methylation sites in adult livers, which correspond to important CYP3A4 transcription factor binding sites including the proximal promoter, XREM and CLEM4 as well as in separate C/EBP and HNF4 alpha binding regions. CpG hypermethylation within these regulatory regions was observed in fetal livers when compared to adult livers. This data suggests that dynamic DNA methylation elements are likely associated with key regulatory CYP3A4 promoter regions and may potentially contribute to the commonly observed interindividual expression of CYP3A4 as well as the hepatic developmental shift in its expression. The findings provide novel insight to CYP3A4 regulation with possible implications for understanding interindividual differences in drug response. (C) 2012 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available