4.3 Article

Biochemical characterization of two thymidylate synthases in Corynebacterium glutamicum NCHU 87078

Journal

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-PROTEINS AND PROTEOMICS
Volume 1804, Issue 9, Pages 1751-1759

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.05.006

Keywords

Corynebacterium glutamicum; Thymidylate synthase A; Thymidylate synthase X; FAD binding; Site-based mutation

Funding

  1. National Science Council of Taiwan [NSC95-2313-B-241-007-MY3, NSC96-2313-B-007-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The genome of Corynebacterium glutamicum NCHU 87078 contains two putative thymidylate synthase genes, designated CgthyA and CgthyX. These two genes were expressed in Escherichia coli NovaBlue and the expressed His(6)-tagged enzymes were purified by nickel-chelate chromatography. The purified CgThyA had a specific activity of 414 mU mg(-1) protein, whereas thymidylate synthase activity for CgThyX could not be detected in a functional complementation assay using a 10-day incubation period. Gel filtration chromatography and chemical cross-linking experiments showed that CgThyX may exist as a dimer in solution, unlike a typical ThyX protein with homotetrameric structure for catalytic activity. Spectroscopic analysis indicated that purified CgThyX lacked the cofactor FAD. The 2.3 angstrom resolution crystal structure of CgThyX-FAD demonstrated a loose tetramer, in which FAD is chelated between the subunits via a manner distinct from that of other flavin-dependent thymidylate synthases. Structure-based mutational studies have identified a non-conserved segment (residues 70-73) of CgThyX protein with crucial role in binding to FAD. Taken together, our biochemical and structural analyses highlight unique features of the C. glutamicum ThyX that distinguish this enzyme from ThyX proteins from other organisms. Our results also suggest that thymidylate synthesis in C. glutamicum requires ThyA but not ThyX. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available