4.6 Article

Differential effects of gemfibrozil and fenofibrate on reverse cholesterol transport from macrophages to feces in vivo

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.11.006

Keywords

Fibrate; PPAR-alpha; HDL; apoA-I; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular disease

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto de Salud Carlos III [FIS 07/1067, 08/1147, 09/0178]
  2. Fundacion Espanola de Arteriosclerosis
  3. [FIS 05/0221]
  4. [CD06/00044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gemfibrozil and fenofibrate, two of the fibrates most used in clinical practice, raise HDL cholesterol (HDLc) and are thought to reduce the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These drugs act as PPAR alpha agonists and upregulate the expression of genes crucial in reverse cholesterol transport (RCT). In the present study, we determined the effects of these two fibrates on RCT from macrophages to feces in vivo in human apoA-I transgenic (hApoA-ITg) mice. [H-3]cholesterol-labeled mouse macrophages were injected intraperitoneally into hApoA-ITg mice treated with intragastric doses of fenofibrate, gemfibrozil or a vehicle solution for 17 days, and radioactivity was determined in plasma, liver and feces. Fenofibrate, but not gemfibrozil, enhanced [H-3]cholesterol flux to plasma and feces of female hApoA-ITg mice. Fenofibrate significantly increased plasma HDLc, HDL phospholipids, hApoA-I levels and phospholipid transfer protein activity, whereas these parameters were not altered by gemfibrozil treatment. Unlike gemfibrozil, fenofibrate also induced the generation of larger HDL particles, which were more enriched in cholesteryl esters, together with higher potential to generate pre beta-HDL formation and caused a significant increase in [H-3]cholesterol efflux to plasma. Our findings demonstrate that fenofibrate promotes RCT from macrophages to feces in vivo and, thus, highlight a differential action of this fibrate on HDL (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available