4.4 Article

Crystallographic and Catalytic Studies of the Peroxide-Shunt Reaction in a Diiron Hydroxylase

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 48, Issue 38, Pages 8932-8939

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi901150a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [MCB-0316232, MCB-0843239]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science [W-31-109-ENG-38]
  3. College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, and Graduate School of the University of Wisconsin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A diiron hydroxylase reaction typically begins by combination of O-2 with a diferrous center to form reactive intermediates capable of hydrocarbon hydroxylation. In this natural cycle, reducing equivalents are provided by specific interactions with electron transfer proteins. The biological process can be bypassed by combining H2O2 with a diferric center, i.e., peroxide-shunt catalysis. Here we show that toluene 4-monooxygenase has a peroxide-shunt reaction that is similar to 600-fold slower than catalysis driven by biological electron transfer. However, the toluene 4-monooxygenase hydroxylase-effector protein complex was stable in the presence of 300 mM H2O2, suggesting overall benign effects of the exogenous oxidant on active site structure and function. The X-ray structure of the toluene 4-monooxygenase hydroxylase-effect or protein complex determined from crystals soaked in H2O2 revealed a bound diatomic molecule, assigned to a cis-mu-1,2-peroxo bridge. This peroxo species resides in an active site position adjacent to the hydrogen-bonding substructure established by effector protein binding and faces into the distal cavity where substrate must bind during regiospecific aromatic ring hydroxylation catalysis. These results provide a new structural benchmark for how activated intermediates may be formed and dispatched during diiron hydroxylase catalysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available