4.5 Article

Comparisons of subunit 5A and 5B isoenzymes of yeast cytochrome c oxidase

Journal

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
Volume 464, Issue -, Pages 335-342

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20140732

Keywords

complex IV; cytochrome c oxidase; Michaelis-Menten constant; oxygen affinity; subunit 5 isoform; turnover number

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F016948/1]
  2. European Union COST Action [CM0902]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/K001094/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/K001094/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Subunit 5 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) is essential for assembly and has two isoforms, 5A and 5B. 5A is expressed under normoxic conditions, whereas 5B is expressed at very low oxygen tensions. As a consequence, COX5A-deleted strains (Delta cox5A) have no or only low levels of CcO under normoxic conditions rendering them respiratory deficient. Previous studies have reported that respiratory growth could be restored by combining Delta cox5A with mutations of ROX1 that encodes a repressor of COX5B expression. In these mutants, 5B isoenzyme expression level was 30-50% of wild-type (5A isoenzyme) and exhibited a maximum catalytic activity up to 3-fold faster than that of 5A isoenzyme. To investigate the origin of this effect, we constructed a mutant strain in which COX5B replaced COX5A downstream of the COX5A promoter. This strain expressed wild-type levels of the 5B isoenzyme, without the complication of additional effects caused by mutation of ROX1. When produced this way, the isoenzymes displayed no significant differences in their maximum catalytic activities or in their affinities for oxygen or cytochrome c. Hence the elevated activity of the 5B isoenzyme in the rox1 mutant is not caused simply by exchange of isoforms and must arise from an additional effect that remains to be resolved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available