4.6 Article

Evaluation of calcium depletion as a strategy for enhancement of mucosal absorption of macromolecules

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.12.146

Keywords

Calu-3; Caco-2; Tight junctions; TEER; Calcium depletion; Mucosal protein delivery

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/H005625/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H005625/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular calcium is crucial for functioning of the epithelial barrier. Compounds that bind calcium, reducing its extracellular levels, have therefore been investigated as mucosal absorption enhancers. However, the conditions under which calcium reduction sufficiently modulates the epithelial barrier to result in meaningful improvements in mucosal drug absorption are unclear. Present work investigated the settings in which calcium depletion leads to optimal epithelial barrier-modulating effects. Using Calu-3 and Caco-2 cell layers and inducing calcium depletion site-specifically (apically, basolaterally or on both sides) we demonstrate that apical calcium removal produces a modest effect on the tight junctions (the extent of the effect being dependent on the duration of apical calcium unavailability), whilst basolateral calcium exhaustion leads to a prominent effect on the epithelial barrier. However, using polyacrylic acid as an example, we show that polymeric calcium-binding agents proposed as mucosal absorption-enhancing excipients alter calcium levels exclusively on the apical side of the epithelium, which explains their modest effect on epithelial barrier modulation (also demonstrated in our work). Therefore the use of calcium-depleting agents, especially those based on macromolecular polymers, is a relatively inefficacious strategy to promote mucosal absorption of macromolecules. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available