4.6 Article

Differentiation induction enhances bortezomib efficacy and overcomes drug resistance in multiple myeloma

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.03.056

Keywords

Multiple myeloma; Bortezomib; Differentiation; Drug resistance

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2008-8151008901000064]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2010B060900022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: It is of clinical importance to find methods to overcome bortezomib resistance. In the current study, we clarified the relationship between resistance to bortezomib and the differentiation status of myeloma cells, and explored the feasibility of induction of differentiation in overcoming bortezomib resistance in myeloma. Methods: Cell morphology, immunoglobulin light-chain protein secretion levels, and XBP-1 expression were used to evaluate the differentiation status of myeloma cells. Low dose 2-ME2 alone or in combination with ATRA was used to induce differentiation in myeloma cells. Results: The differentiation status of myeloma cells was related to myeloma sensitivity to bortezomib. After successful induction of differentiation, the myeloma cells were more sensitive to bortezomib with decreased growth and an increased rate of apoptosis. Induction of differentiation increased the proteasome workload in myeloma cells by increasing immunoglobulin secretion, while reducing proteasome capacity by decreasing proteasome activity. The imbalance between increased proteasome workload and decreased proteasome capacity is a possible mechanism by which induction of differentiation overcomes myeloma resistance to bortezomib. Conclusion: The current study demonstrated, for the first time, that myeloma differentiation status is associated with myeloma sensitivity to bortezomib and that induction of differentiation can overcome myeloma resistance to bortezomib. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available