4.6 Article

The NCI-N87 cell line as a gastric epithelial barrier model for drug permeability assay

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.07.106

Keywords

NCI-N87 gastric epithelial barrier; Transepithelial electrical resistance; Tight junctions; Gastric drug permeation; Apparent permeability coefficient; pH gradient

Funding

  1. MITACS (Canada)
  2. Corealis Pharma Inc. (Laval, Canada)
  3. FQRNT (Quebec Nature and Technology Research Fund)
  4. NSERC (Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate the human NCI-N87 cell line as a model for gastric permeability drug studies under pH conditions of the stomach. The optimal conditions that led NCI-N87 cells to form a typical differentiated gastric epithelial barrier were a seeding density of 2.5 x 10(5) cells/cm(2) on porous inserts and growth in serum-complemented RPMI-1640 medium until 18-27 days post-confluency. The resulting cell monolayers showed moderately high transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) values of about 500 Omega cm(2), cells of polygonal morphology expressing E-cadherin and ZO-1 proteins at their contact surfaces, and production of mucus clusters. The monolayers withstood apical pH of 7.4 down to 3.0 with the basal pH fixed at 7.4. The apparent permeability coefficients (P-app) of model compounds were evaluated in the apical-to-basolateral and basolateral-to-apical directions under different pH gradients. The monolayers were impermeable to the integrity marker Lucifer Yellow (low Papp of 0.3-1.1 x 10(-6) cm/s). The furosemide P-app (0.4-1.5 x 10(-5) cm/s) were slightly dependent on pH but remained moderate. The caffeine P-app (4.2-5.0 x 10(-5) cm/s) were higher and insensitive to pH changes. The NCI-N87 cell line provides a useful in vitro tool to assess gastric drug permeability and absorption under physiologic conditions prevailing in the human stomach. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available