4.2 Article

Noradrenergic neuromodulation in the olfactory bulb modulates odor habituation and spontaneous discrimination

Journal

BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages 816-826

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/a0012522

Keywords

noradrenaline; norepinephrine; olfaction; learning; behavioral pharmacology

Funding

  1. NIDCD NIH HHS [R03 DC007725, DC008702, R01 DC008702-02, R03 DC007725-03, R01 DC008702, R03 DC007725-02, R01 DC008702-03] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Noradrenergic projections from the locus coeruleus (LC) project to the olfactory bulb (OB), a cortical structure implicated in odor learning and perceptual differentiation among similar odorants. The authors tested the role of OB noradrenaline (NA) in short-term olfactory memory using an animal model of LC degeneration coupled with intrabulbar infusions of NA. Specifically, the authors lesioned cortical noradrenergic fibers in mice with the noradrenergic neurotoxin N-Ethyl-N-(2-chloroethyl)-2-bromobenzylamine hydrochloride (DSP4) and measured the effects on an olfactory habituation/spontaneous discrimination task. DSP4-treated mice failed to habituate to repeated odor presentations, indicating that they could not remember odors over the 5-min intertrial interval. The authors then infused NA bilaterally into the OBs of both DSP4-treated and nonlesioned control animals at two concentrations (10(-3)M and 10(-5)M, 2 mu l/side). In DSP4-treated animals, NA administration at either concentration restored normal habituation and spontaneous discrimination performance, indicating that noradrenergic neuromodulation mediates these aspects of perceptual learning and that its efficacy does not require activity-dependent local regulation of NA release. Functional OB learning mechanisms may be necessary for normal odor recognition and differentiation among physically similar odorants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available