4.7 Editorial Material

The costs and benefits of replication studies

Journal

BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 41, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X18000596

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The debate about whether replication studies should become mainstream is essentially driven by disagreements about their costs and benefits and the best ways to allocate limited resources. Determining when replications are worthwhile requires quantifying their expected utility. We argue that a formalized framework for such evaluations can be useful for both individual decision-making and collective discussions about replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Deciding What to Replicate: A Decision Model for Replication Study Selection Under Resource and Knowledge Constraints

Peder Mortvedt Isager, Robbie C. M. van Aert, Stepan Bahnik, Mark J. Brandt, K. Andrew DeSoto, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Joachim Krueger, Marco Perugini, Ivan Ropovik, Anna E. van 't Veer, Marek Vranka, Daniel Lakens

Summary: This article emphasizes the importance of replication in scientific knowledge and proposes a general rule for selecting replication studies based on their replication value. It discusses the concept of replication value and its relationship with the importance and uncertainty of the study. The article aims to provide theoretical foundations for concrete guidelines on study selection in replication research.

PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2023)

Article Psychology, Social

Fact or Artifact? Demand Characteristics and Participants' Beliefs Can Moderate, but Do Not Fully Account for, the Effects of Facial Feedback on Emotional Experience

Nicholas A. Coles, Lowell Gaertner, Brooke Frohlich, Jeff T. Larsen, Dana M. Basnight-Brown

Summary: The facial feedback hypothesis suggests that facial expressions can influence emotional experience, and the results of the experiments indicate that these effects are not solely driven by demand or placebo effects.

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science

Patrick S. Forscher, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Nicholas A. Coles, Miguel Alejandro Silan, Natalia Dutra, Dana Basnight-Brown, Hans IJzerman

Summary: Progress in psychology has been hindered by challenges in replicability, generalizability, strategy selection, inferential reproducibility, and computational reproducibility. The emerging emphasis on big-team science may help address these challenges but also carries unique risks.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Not All Effects Are Indispensable: Psychological Science Requires Verifiable Lines of Reasoning for Whether an Effect Matters

Farid Anvari, Rogier Kievit, Daniel Lakens, Charlotte R. Pennington, Andrew K. Przybylski, Leo Tiokhin, Brenton M. Wiernik, Amy Orben

Summary: Recent articles have revisited the importance of seemingly small effect sizes in psychological science to discourage researchers from heuristically dismissing them as unimportant. The field is now in danger of accepting all effects as potentially important, and this study aims to encourage researchers to thoroughly consider the mechanisms that amplify or counteract the importance of an observed effect size. By transparently providing verifiable lines of reasoning, researchers can promote a more rigorous assessment of psychological findings and their generalizability.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Are Small Effects the Indispensable Foundation for a Cumulative Psychological Science? A Reply to Gotz et al. (2022)

Maximilian A. Primbs, Charlotte R. Pennington, Daniel Lakens, Miguel Alejandro A. Silan, Dwayne S. N. Lieck, Patrick S. Forscher, Erin M. Buchanan, Samuel J. Westwood

Summary: Gotz et al. argue that small effects are crucial for cumulative psychological science, but we raise objections based on the misleading analogy between genetics and psychology, the reliance on p values in psychology publications, and the necessity for empirical evidence or falsifiable reasoning when claiming the importance of small effects.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?

Merle-Marie Pittelkow, Sarahanne M. Field, Peder M. Isager, Anna E. van't Veer, Thomas Anderson, Scott N. Cole, Tomas Dominik, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Sebahat Gok, Tom Heyman, Marc Jekel, Timothy J. Luke, David B. Mitchell, Rik Peels, Rosina Pendrous, Samuel Sarrazin, Jacob M. Schauer, Eva Specker, Ulrich S. Tran, Marek A. Vranka, Jelte M. Wicherts, Naoto Yoshimura, Rolf A. Zwaan, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Summary: Increasing the execution of replication studies is important for restoring credibility in empirical research. However, there is a mismatch between the number of potential replication targets and available resources. To address this issue, researchers propose a study involving the scientific community to create a checklist for selecting replication targets in psychology. By using a modified Delphi approach, consensus was reached on what factors to consider when selecting a replication target. This checklist can help researchers transparently communicate their rationale for selecting studies for replication.

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The Psychological Science Accelerator's COVID-19 rapid-response dataset

Erin M. Buchanan, Savannah C. Lewis, Bastien Paris, Patrick S. Forscher, Jeffrey M. Pavlacic, Julie E. Beshears, Shira Meir Drexler, Amelie Gourdon-Kanhukamwe, Peter R. Mallik, Miguel Alejandro A. Silan, Jeremy K. Miller, Hans IJzerman, Hannah Moshontz, Jennifer L. Beaudry, Jordan W. Suchow, Christopher R. Chartier, Nicholas A. Coles, MohammadHasan Sharifian, Anna Louise Todsen, Carmel A. Levitan, Flavio Azevedo, Nicole Legate, Blake Heller, Alexander J. Rothman, Charles A. Dorison, Brian P. Gill, Ke Wang, Vaughan W. Rees, Nancy Gibbs, Amit Goldenberg, Thuy-vy Thi Nguyen, James J. Gross, Gwenael Kaminski, Claudia C. von Bastian, Mariola Paruzel-Czachura, Farnaz Mosannenzadeh, Soufian Azouaghe, Alexandre Bran, Susana Ruiz-Fernandez, Anabela Caetano Santos, Niv Reggev, Janis H. Zickfeld, Handan Akkas, Myrto Pantazi, Ivan Ropovik, Max Korbmacher, Patricia Arriaga, Biljana Gjoneska, Lara Warmelink, Sara G. Alves, Gabriel Lins de Holanda Coelho, Stefan Stieger, Vidar Schei, Paul H. P. Hanel, Barnabas Szaszi, Maksim Fedotov, Jan Antfolk, Gabriela-Mariana Marcu, Jana Schroetter, Jonas R. Kunst, Sandra J. Geiger, Adeyemi Adetula, Halil Emre Kocalar, Julita Kielinska, Pavol Kacmar, Ahmed Bokkour, Oscar J. Galindo-Caballero, Ikhlas Djamai, Sara Johanna Poentinen, Bamikole Emmanuel Agesin, Teodor Jernsaether, Anum Urooj, Nikolay R. Rachev, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Murathan Kurfali, Ilse L. Pit, Ranran Li, Sami coksan, Dmitrii Dubrov, Tamar Elise Paltrow, Gabriel Banik, Tatiana Korobova, Anna Studzinska, Xiaoming Jiang, John Jamir Benzon R. Aruta, Jachym Vintr, Faith Chiu, Lada Kaliska, Jana B. Berkessel, Murat Tuemer, Sara Morales-Izquierdo, Hu Chuan-Peng, Kevin Vezirian, Anna Dalla Rosa, Olga Bialobrzeska, Martin R. Vasilev, Julia Beitner, Ondrej Kacha, Barbara Zuro, Minja Westerlund, Mina Nedelcheva-Datsova, Andrej Findor, Dajana Krupic, Marta Kowal, Adrian Dahl Askelund, Razieh Pourafshari, Jasna Milosevic Dordevic, Nadya-Daniela Schmidt, Ekaterina Baklanova, Anna Szala, Ilya Zakharov, Marek A. Vranka, Keiko Ihaya, Caterina Grano, Nicola Cellini, Michal Bialek, Lisa Anton-Boicuk, Ilker Dalgar, Arca Adiguezel, Jeroen P. H. Verharen, Princess Lovella G. Maturan, Angelos P. Kassianos, Raquel Oliveira, Martin Cadek, Vera Cubela Adoric, Asil Ali oezdogru, Therese E. Sverdrup, Balazs Aczel, Danilo Zambrano, Afroja Ahmed, Christian K. Tamnes, Yuki Yamada, Leonhard Volz, Naoyuki Sunami, Lilian Suter, Luc Vieira, Agata Groyecka-Bernard, Julia Arhondis Kamburidis, Ulf-Dietrich Reips, Mikayel Harutyunyan, Gabriel Agboola Adetula, Tara Bulut Allred, Krystian Barzykowski, Benedict G. Antazo, Andras N. Zsido, Dusana Dusan Sakan, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, Lina Pernilla Ahlgren, Matej Hruska, Diego Vega, Efisio Manunta, Aviv Mokady, Mariagrazia Capizzi, Marcel Martoncik, Nicolas Say, Katarzyna Filip, Roosevelt Vilar, Karolina Staniaszek, Milica Vdovic, Matus Adamkovic, Niklas Johannes, Nandor Hajdu, Noga Cohen, Clara Overkott, Dino Krupic, Barbora Hubena, Gustav Nilsonne, Giovanna Mioni, Claudio Singh Solorzano, Tatsunori Ishii, Zhang Chen, Elizaveta Kushnir, Cemre Karaarslan, Rafael R. Ribeiro, Ahmed Khaoudi, Malgorzata Kossowska, Jozef Bavolar, Karlijn Hoyer, Marta Roczniewska, Alper Karababa, Maja Becker, Renan P. Monteiro, Yoshihiko Kunisato, Irem Metin-Orta, Sylwia Adamus, Luca Kozma, Gabriela Czarnek, Artur Domurat, Eva Strukelj, Daniela Serrato Alvarez, Michal Parzuchowski, Sebastien Massoni, Johanna Czamanski-Cohen, Ekaterina Pronizius, Fany Muchembled, Kevin van Schie, Asli Sacakli, Evgeniya Hristova, Anna O. Kuzminska, Abdelilah Charyate, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Reza Afhami, Nadyanna M. Majeed, Erica D. Musser, Miroslav Sirota, Robert M. Ross, Siu Kit Yeung, Marietta Papadatou-Pastou, Francesco Foroni, Ines A. T. Almeida, Dmitry Grigoryev, David M. G. Lewis, Dawn L. Holford, Steve M. J. Janssen, Srinivasan Tatachari, Carlota Batres, Jonas K. Olofsson, Shimrit Daches, Anabel Belaus, Gerit Pfuhl, Nadia Sarai Corral-Frias, Daniela Sousa, Jan Philipp Roeer, Peder Mortvedt Isager, Hendrik Godbersen, Radoslaw B. Walczak, Natalia Van Doren, Dongning Ren, Tripat Gill, Martin Voracek, Lisa M. DeBruine, Michele Anne, Sanja Batic Ocovaj, Andrew G. Thomas, Alexios Arvanitis, Thomas Ostermann, Kelly Wolfe, Nwadiogo Chisom Arinze, Carsten Bundt, Claus Lamm, Robert J. Calin-Jageman, William E. Davis, Maria Karekla, Sasa Zorjan, Lisa M. Jaremka, Jim Uttley, Monika Hricova, Monica A. Koehn, Natalia Kiselnikova, Hui Bai, Anthony J. Krafnick, Busra Bahar Balci, Tonia Ballantyne, Samuel Lins, Zahir Vally, Celia Esteban-Serna, Kathleen Schmidt, Paulo Manuel L. Macapagal, Paulina Szwed, Przemyslaw Marcin Zdybek, David Moreau, W. Matthew Collins, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Iris Vilares, Ulrich S. Tran, Jordane Boudesseul, Nihan Albayrak-Aydemir, Barnaby James Wyld Dixson, Jennifer T. Perillo, Ana Ferreira, Erin C. Westgate, Christopher L. Aberson, Azuka Ikechukwu Arinze, Bastian Jaeger, Muhammad Mussaffa Butt, Jaime R. Silva, Daniel Shafik Storage, Allison P. Janak, William Jimenez-Leal, Jose A. Soto, Agnieszka Sorokowska, Randy McCarthy, Alexa M. Tullett, Martha Frias-Armenta, Matheus Fernando Felix Ribeiro, Andree Hartanto, Paul A. G. Forbes, Megan L. Willis, Maria del Carmen R. Tejada, Adriana Julieth Olaya Torres, Ian D. Stephen, David C. Vaidis, Anabel de la Rosa-gomez, Karen Yu, Clare A. M. Sutherland, Mathi Manavalan, Behzad Behzadnia, Jan Urban, Ernest Baskin, Joseph P. McFall, Chisom Esther Ogbonnaya, Cynthia H. Y. Fu, Rima-Maria Rahal, Izuchukwu L. G. Ndukaihe, Thomas J. Hostler, Heather Barry Kappes, Piotr Sorokowski, Meetu Khosla, Ljiljana B. Lazarevic, Luis Eudave, Johannes K. Vilsmeier, Elkin O. Luis, Rafal Muda, Elena Agadullina, Rodrigo A. Carcamo, Crystal Reeck, Gulnaz Anjum, Monica Camila Toro Venegas, Michal Misiak, Richard M. Ryan, Nora L. Nock, Giovanni A. Travaglino, Michael C. Mensink, Gilad Feldman, Aaron L. Wichman, Weilun Chou, Ignazio Ziano, Martin Seehuus, William J. Chopik, Franki Y. H. Kung, Joelle Carpentier, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Hongfei Du, Qinyu Xiao, Tiago J. S. Lima, Chris Noone, Sandersan Onie, Frederick Verbruggen, Theda Radtke, Maximilian A. Primbs

Summary: In response to COVID-19, the Psychological Science Accelerator conducted three large-scale psychological studies on loss-gain framing, cognitive reappraisals, and autonomy framing manipulations. The data collected from 73,223 participants included specific measures, a general questionnaire on health prevention behaviors and COVID-19 experience, and demographic information. Participants were from 111 geopolitical regions and completed the survey in 44 unique languages/dialects. The anonymized dataset provides opportunities for secondary analysis on coping, framing, and self-determination in a global sample obtained during the COVID-19 pandemic.

SCIENTIFIC DATA (2023)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations

Heidi A. A. Baumgartner, Nicolas Alessandroni, Krista Byers-Heinlein, Michael C. C. Frank, J. Kiley Hamlin, Melanie Soderstrom, Jan G. G. Voelkel, Robb Willer, Francis Yuen, Nicholas A. A. Coles

Summary: The past decade has seen a rise in big team science initiatives, where a large number of researchers collaborate to achieve a common goal. However, there is a lack of guidance on how to establish, manage, and participate in these collaborations. This paper integrates insights from various multidisciplinary big team science projects to provide a practical guide. It covers initial considerations for launching a project, running and completing it, and addressing challenges unique to big team science, such as authorship decisions and collaborative writing.

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE (2023)

Editorial Material Psychology, Biological

'Big team' science challenges us to reconsider authorship

Nicholas A. A. Coles, Lisa M. M. DeBruine, Flavio Azevedo, Heidi A. A. Baumgartner, Michael C. C. Frank

Summary: 'Big team' science challenges researchers to reconsider authorship issues including defining authorship-worthy contributions, documenting contributions, and handling disagreements among coauthors. We propose steps to resolve these issues.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests

Duygu Uygun Tunc, Mehmet Necip Tunc, Daniel Lakens

Summary: Researchers often make dichotomous claims based on continuous test statistics, which have been criticized as a misuse of statistics. However, we argue that these claims play important roles in science, both in terms of epistemology and pragmatism. They help transform data into tentative facts that can support or challenge theoretical claims, and they facilitate scrutiny and criticism among peers.

THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2023)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Shifting the Level of Selection in Science

Leo Tiokhin, Karthik Panchanathan, Paul E. Smaldino, Daniel Lakens

Summary: Criteria for recognizing and rewarding scientists primarily focus on individual contributions. This creates a conflict between what is best for scientists' careers and what is best for science. In this article, the authors propose using the theory of multilevel selection to modify incentives and align individual and collective interests in science. Shifting the level of selection from individuals to groups can help address problems such as accounting for diverse contributions, reducing individual-level competition, and promoting team science.

PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2023)

No Data Available