Journal
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages 452-+Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X09990641
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Evans & Levinson (E&L) argue that language universals are a myth. Christiansen and Chater (2008) have recently suggested that innate universal grammar is also a myth. This commentary explores the connection between these two theses, and draws wider implications for the cognitive science of language.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available