4.5 Article

Neotectonic basin and landscape evolution in the Eastern Cordillera of NW Argentina, Humahuaca Basin (∼24°S)

Journal

BASIN RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 554-573

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bre.12016

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG-Leibniz Center for Earth Surface Process and Climate Studies (DFG grant) [STR 373/19-19]
  2. DFG grant [STR373/32-1]
  3. Instrumentation and Facilities Program, Division of Earth Sciences, U.S. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intermontane Quebrada de Humahuaca Basin (Humahuaca Basin) in the Eastern Cordillera of the southern Central Andes of NW Argentina (23 degrees-24 degrees S) records the evolution of a formerly contiguous foreland-basin setting to an intermontane depositional environment during the late stages of Cenozoic Andean mountain building. This basin has been and continues to be subject to shortening and surface uplift, which has resulted in the establishment of an orographic barrier for easterly sourced moisture-bearing winds along its eastern margin, followed by leeward aridification. We present new U-Pb zircon ages and palaeocurrent reconstructions suggesting that from at least 6Ma until 4.2Ma, the Humahuaca Basin was an integral part of a largely contiguous depositional system that became progressively decoupled from the foreland as deformation migrated eastward. The Humahuaca Basin experienced multiple cycles of severed hydrological conditions and subsequent re-captured drainage, fluvial connectivity with the foreland and sediment evacuation. Depositional and structural relationships among faults, regional unconformities and deformed landforms reveal a general pattern of intrabasin deformation that appears to be associated with different cycles of alluviation and basin excavation in which deformation is focused on basin-internal structures during or subsequent to phases of large-scale sediment removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available