3.9 Article

Regurgitant Valvular Disease Prevalence and Progression Found on Echocardiogram in Military Aviators

Journal

AVIATION SPACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 85, Issue 10, Pages 1013-1018

Publisher

AEROSPACE MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.3357/ASEM.3924.2014

Keywords

aortic insufficiency; mitral regurgitation; cardiac risk factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction:The prevalence, progression rates, and outcomes affecting aviator valvular heart disease have not been extensively studied. Methods: The U.S. Air Force (USAF) School of Aerospace Medicine's Clinical Sciences Database was used to determine prevalence and progression rates for regurgitant valvular disease. A subset of the initial population was further evaluated for risk factors that increased the likelihood of progression. Descriptive statistical analysis, analysis of variance, and t-test calculations were completed. Results: There were 8475 unique aviators with some degree of valvular regurgitation for an overall prevalence of 3.0%. The mitral and aortic valves were most likely to have mild and moderate or greater regurgitation, respectively. Progression rates from mild to moderate were 8% in the aortic valve, 2% in the mitral valve, and less than 1% in the pulmonic and tricuspid valves. Progression rates from moderate to severe were over 20% for both the mitral and aortic valves. The only risk factors correlating to progression of valvular disease were lower levels of high-density lipoproteins in the mitral and aortic valves and triglycerides in the mitral valve. Discussion: In USAF aviators, progression rates for mild or greater aortic valve regurgitation and moderate or greater mitral valve regurgitation are significant and should be followed closely. Classic risk factors of age, tobacco use, elevated blood pressure, and hyperlipidemia have no association with increased risk of valvular progression or rate of progression. Study outcomes validate the current USAF policy for valvular heart disease in aviators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available