4.8 Editorial Material

To save or degrade: balancing proteasome homeostasis to maximize cell survival

Journal

AUTOPHAGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 2029-2031

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1515531

Keywords

ATP; Blm10; carbon starvation; pH; proteaphagy; proteasome; proteasome storage granules; Spg5; ubiquitin; Ubp3

Categories

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  2. Office of Basic Energy Science
  3. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division [DE-FG02-88ER13968]
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Plant Genome Research Program [IOS-1329956]
  6. National Institutes of Health
  7. National Institute of General Medical Science [R01-GM124452-01A1]
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM124452] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autophagic degradation of proteasomes (termed proteaphagy) is a conserved mechanism by which cells eliminate excess or damaged particles. This clearance is induced rapidly when organisms are starved for nitrogen and, because proteasomes are highly abundant, their breakdown likely makes an important contribution to the amino acid pools necessary for survival. By contrast, our recent studies found that proteasomes are not degraded in response to carbon starvation, even though bulk macroautophagy is similarly activated. Instead, carbon starvation induces sequestration of proteasomes into membrane-less cytoplasmic condensates previously termed proteasome storage granules (PSGs), which protect proteasomes from autophagic degradation. Preserving proteasomes in PSGs enhances the ability of yeast cells to recover from a variety of stresses, implying that rapid remobilization of stored proteasomes when conditions improve is advantageous to cell fitness. Consequently, the choice of whether to save or degrade proteasomes can profoundly impact cell survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available