4.5 Article

Mapping underground layers in the super arid Gidron Wadi using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT)

Journal

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 79-83

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.05.008

Keywords

Acacia raddiana; Acacia tortilis; Underground water; Water use; Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT); Flash floods; Ecophysiology; Arava

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Along the arid Arava, southern Israel, acacia trees are considered keystone species. Based on survival of acacias through drought years that have not seen a single rainfall or flood, it is assumed that acacias endure the local harsh conditions by drawing water from deep underground water reservoirs. Studying water use of acacias has so far been done by exposing root systems or by isotopic water measurements, both problematic methods. We present a new application of a two-dimensional direct current electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) to measure the electrical resistivity of the subsurface. We applied the ERT device to two fixed 100 m transects cutting across (north-south) and along (west-east) the super arid Gidron Wadi during March, April and August 2013. An inversion model was used to create a map of electrical resistivity of the layers below ground, an indirect indicator of the underground water content. We identified a conductive layer located at similar to 7-10 m below ground in all surveys. Although we could not identify changes to this apparent perched aquifer, such a layer may be a secondary source of water for acacias that can explain their survival in drought years. Further ERT-aided studies are needed to correlate acacia distribution and ecophysiological state with perched aquifers, even if quantitative analysis of their replenishment in such desert environments is not trivial. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available