4.0 Article

Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages 62-67

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/PY10081

Keywords

evaluation; research culture; team based

Funding

  1. Griffith University Primary Health Care Research Evaluation and Development Program, Brisbane, Australia
  2. Queensland Health Metro South allied health
  3. Health Practitioner Research Grants Scheme, Queensland Health
  4. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research capacity building (RCB) in Australia has recently focussed on strategies that take a whole of system approach to developing research culture at individual, team and organisation levels. Although a theoretical framework exists, no tool has been published that quantitatively measures the effectiveness of RCB interventions aimed at these three levels. A sample of 134 allied health workers was used to validate the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool. Item level analysis was undertaken using Cronbach's alpha and exploratory factor analysis, and test-retest reliability was examined using intra-class correlations (ICC). The tool had one factor emerge for each domain, with excellent internal consistency for organisation, team and individual domains (alpha = 0.95, 0.96 and 0.96 respectively; and factor loadings ranges of 0.58-0.89, 0.65-0.89 and 0.59-0.93 respectively). The overall mean score (total) for each domain was: 5.4 (inter-quartile range 3.9-7.7), 4.4 (IQR 2.6-6.1) and 3.9 (IQR 2.9-6) for the organisation, team and individual domains respectively. Test-retest reliability was strong for each domain: organisation ICC = 0.77, team ICC = 0.83 and individual ICC = 0.82. The RCC tool has three domains measuring research capacity and culture at organisation, team and individual levels. It demonstrates excellent internal consistency and strong test-retest reliability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available