4.0 Article

Ultrastructure of symbiotic germination of the orchid Dendrobium officinale with its mycobiont, Sebacina sp.

Journal

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 229-234

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/BT14017

Keywords

mycorrhizal association; orchidaceae; seed germination

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic scientific research operation cost of state-levelled public welfare scientific research courtyard [YZ-12-14]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170314, 30900004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dendrobium officinale is an endangered epiphytic orchidaceous medicinal plant. Similar to other orchid plants, the seed germination of D. officinale under natural conditions depends nutritionally upon mycorrhizal fungi. The compatible fungi have been isolated from D. officinale protocorms using in situ seed baiting technique in our previous studies. However, the interaction between seed germination of D. officinale and its mycobiont is still unclear. In the present study, we investigated the morphological changes of seed and fungus during the symbiotic germination using a light microscope and transmission electron microscope. Seeds of D. officinale have no conspicuous suspensor cells. The fungus enters into the embryo cell through the posterior end of the embryo and colonises the cortical cell in the first stage of germination (Stage 1). Then, the hyphae form pelotons with the protocorm development (Stages 1-3). After protocorm formation, the reinvaded fungal hyphae conspicuously decrease. Invaded hyphae lose bioactivity, form clumps and start degeneration at Stage 4 or 5 (seedling development). When penetrating the neighbouring cortical cell, the fungal hyphae constrict to collar shape at the contacted site and follow by swelling in the apex. Our study suggested that fungi trigger protocorm development and concomitant reserve utilisation during the symbiotic germination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available