4.3 Review

The role of alprazolam for the treatment of panic disorder in Australia

Journal

AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages 212-224

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0004867411432074

Keywords

Panic disorder; alprazolam; efficacy; prescription

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanley Medical Research Foundation
  2. MBF
  3. NHMRC
  4. Beyond Blue
  5. Geelong Medical Research Foundation
  6. Bristol Myers Squibb
  7. Eli Lilly
  8. Glaxo SmithKline
  9. Organon
  10. Novartis
  11. Mayne Pharma
  12. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To investigate the potential impact of increasing prescription rates of alprazolam for the treatment of panic disorder (PD) in Australia through a review of efficacy, tolerability and adverse outcome literature. Methods: Data were sourced by a literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and a manual search of scientific journals to identify relevant articles. Clinical practice guidelines from the American Psychiatric Association, National Institute of Clinical Excellence, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists and World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry were sourced. Prescription data were sourced from Australian governmental sources. Results: Alprazolam has shown efficacy for control of PD symptoms, particularly in short-term controlled clinical trials, but is no longer recommended as a first-line pharmacological treatment due to concerns about the risks of developing tolerance, dependence and abuse potential. Almost no evidence is available comparing alprazolam to current first-line pharmacological treatment. Despite this, prescription rates are increasing. A number of potential issues including use in overdose and impact on car accidents are noted. Conclusion: Although effective for PD symptoms in clinical trials, a number of potential issues may exist with use. Consideration of its future place in PD treatment in Australia may be warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available