4.1 Article

Phosphonate applied by trunk injection controls stem canker and decreases Phytophthora pod rot (black pod) incidence in cocoa in Sulawesi

Journal

AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages 170-175

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1071/AP09078

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research [CP/2000/105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem canker and Phytophthora pod rot (PPR) or black pod caused by Phytophthora palmivora are serious diseases of cocoa ( Theobroma cacao L.) in Sulawesi, Indonesia, causing high yield losses for smallholders, possibly exceeded only by losses due to the cocoa pod borer (CPB), Conopomorpha cramerella. Potassium phosphonate ( phosphite) applied by trunk injection has been demonstrated to effectively control canker and PPR in Papua New Guinea. The method was tested in a field trial in south-east Sulawesi. Fifty trees were injected with phosphonate, 50 with water and 50 were left untreated. Phosphonate was applied at a rate of similar to 16 g active ingredient per tree per year, depending on the size of each tree. Trees were evaluated each month for canker severity, for PPR incidence and for CPB incidence and severity. From 4 months after the initial injection, trees treated with phosphonate had negligible levels of canker. Over a 2.5-year period, phosphonate significantly decreased PPR incidence. Cycles of PPR infection occurred in the wet season with PPR incidence fluctuating from less than 30% to greater than 75%. These fluctuations might have been due to variations in rainfall causing natural cycles of sporulation and infection. CPB incidence did not differ significantly between treatments. Since trunk injection of phosphonate effectively controls stem canker and decreases PPR in the long term it provides a valuable option for the management of these diseases for cocoa smallholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available